IRRIGATION
USING A “PHYTOMONITORING” SYSTEM
Experiment in
Pepper Plants of Lorca and Parker
Eviatar Itiel, Yoram Zvieli - Negev Extension Service,
Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development Rivka Offenbach, Rami Golan - Arava R&D Center Aharon Barda, Moshav Tzofar
Summary
Pepper plants of Lorca and Parker varieties were grown in a commercial
25 mesh net-house in Moshav Tzofar.
Phytomonitoring system ('Phytech'
Company, Yad Mordechai) was installed in two irrigation treatment
plots in mid-September, 2002: a) the control "Commercial" treatment in
which the grower, based on his experience, made the water application
decisions, and b) the "Phytech" treatment in which application
decisions were made based on the analysis of the readings of the
system's various sensors.

Beginning mid-October one could detect, based on sensors' night
readings, VPD values that caused transpiration during night hours. (VPD
= vapor pressure deficit - the difference between vapor pressure under
saturation and the one actually measured.) In fact, based on these
findings, the "Phytech" treatment received only night irrigations from
mid-October till mid-March.
The number and timing of irrigations in the "Phytech" plots was
determined based on the stem diameter sensor fluctuation readings in
the Parker pepper.
The "Phytech"
treatment yielded 33% and 15% higher than the "Commercial"
treatment for Parker and Lorca varieties, respectively. |
This increase in yield fits the results obtained in a similar trial
carried out a year earlier in the Lorca variety. There was only slight
increase in the exportable percentage, since most of the additional
yield consisted of deformed fruit (reason unknown) disqualified for
export. Aside from this problem, night irrigation had no negative
effects on fruit quality parameters including cracking, and this
contrary to the common opinion on the negative effect of night
irrigation on fruit cracking.
Considering the big demand of irrigation water in the dry hot season
and the insufficient supply of water during the day time, night
irrigation can greatly ease day-time water supply and distribution
"bottle-necks" common in summer days in Moshav Tzofar.
Introduction, and Trial Aims
Last season, the pepper area grown under net-houses in the Arava
Valley and Kikar Sedom was 4,700 dunam (470 hectare), accounting for
60% of all pepper grown in the region.
The micro-climate pervading inside a net-house is different from that
inside a plastic-film covered greenhouse. There are autumn and winter
nights in the Arava in which the VPD values rise and the plant loses
of its water. To the extent the plant enters the morning following
with a water deficit, it loses growth ability (see diagram 1). Setting
the irrigation timing based on the phytomonitoring system, enables
detecting such a situation in the plants through sensing stem diameter
response to morning irrigation: if response as measured in stem
swelling is large, it means there was a noticeable night moisture
deficit.
There is also a clear technical advantage to night irrigation related
to the water distribution limitations in Moshav Tzofar, where the
system is over-loaded during day-time. Moreover, there are growers
without water-strorage capacity who are forced to irrigate partially
at night. Studying the effects of night irrigations is therefore
important.
Methods and Materials
Pepper plants of Parker and Lorca varieties were planted in a
net-house on 2 August 2002 on the Barda farm in Moshav Tzofar. There
were two irrigation treatments planned: a) the control "Commercial"
treatment in which the grower, based on his best knowledge and
experience, made the water application decisions, and b) the "Phytech"
treatment in which application decisions were made based on the
analysis of the readings of the system's various sensors. Forty five
days after planting the Phytomonitoring sensors were put in place,
showing no reason to change the irrigation regime at that time. Based
on sensor readings, the "Phytech" treatment was split from the
"Commercial" one mid-October. Two beds for each variety X treatment
were designated making for a total of 8 beds.
Representative plants in each of the two Parker variety "Phytech"
treatment plots were monitored by means of phytomonitoring sensors of
"Phytech" Company of Yad Mordechai.
The plant sensors included a stem diameter monitor, a leaf-sap flow
monitor, a leaf temperature monitor and a fruit diameter monitor.
Environmental and soil sensors were also installed - measuring
radiation, air temperature, relative humidity and soil moisture.
As discussed above, for each variety two beds were selected for the
"Phytech" treatment, on which the exact same irrigation regime was
applied. Two yield sampling plots were marked in each bed, making for
a total of 16 harvest plots - four for each treatment x variety. The
fruit harvested was sorted and weighed in nearby Yair research
station. The plots in fact do not constitute true replications since
they could not be designated randomly. Results are therefore presented
as averages only, without analysis of variance.
.jpg) |
Results and Discussion
In relatively dry nights in which vapor pressure deficit (VPD) values
can rise to quite a high level, night transpiration can account for
10% of total 24-hour day transpiration (Moreshet et al. 1999). The
same work showed that rising night VPD values stops small fruit
growth.
The results obtained (table 1) show a definite trend of increased
total yield and number of fruits in the "Phytech" treatment in both
pepper varieties, compared to the control. This increase began with
early December harvests (diagram 2) in Parker var, while only in late
March in Lorca var. This increase in both total yield and fruit number
did hardly at all, however, result in increased exportable fruit
(actually lowering exportable fruit percentage). The reason for this
decrease in exportable fruit percentage in both varieties was due to
the increased (doubled) number of deformed fruit, a phenomenon which
began with December pickings in Parker (see diagram 3) and with end
January pickings in Lorca. An explanation for this phenomenon could
not be found so far.
It is commonly thought that night irrigation induces fruit cracking in
tomato and pepper (Moreshet et al., 1999). However, in two years of
night irrigation no effect on fruit cracking was observed at all.
Diagram 1. Rate of change in stem
diameter and VPD, in night- and day- irrigation regimes

Table 1. Yield components in
irrigation regime trial for pepper using Phytech phytomonitoring
system
variety |
irrigation treatment |
total yield
kg/sq.m. |
number fruit - total
fruit/sq.m |
ave. fruit weight
grams |
export yield kg/sq.m. |
number fruit, exportable
fruit/sq.m. |
average exp. fruit
weight - grams |
number fruit deformed
fruit/sq.m |
Lorca |
control |
8.1 |
51 |
156 |
6.0 |
28 |
210 |
12 |
Lorca |
phytech |
9.3 |
60 |
154 |
5.9 |
28 |
204 |
20 |
Parker |
control |
8.1 |
44 |
181 |
5.1 |
23 |
215 |
12 |
Parker |
phytech |
10.9 |
75 |
143 |
5.8 |
29 |
199 |
38 |
Total Yield
Lorca Lorca Parker Parker
Total Fruit |
 |
control Phytech control Phytech
Number |
|